You are here

Government & Politics

Government Logo

Clay Bennett | GOP Marketing / www.truthdig.com

Series | Socialism: Theory & Practice, Part 2, Sidney J. Gluck

  • Capitalism is a "dog-eat-dog" system based upon the exploitation of working people. Socialism is a cooperative alternative to capitalism. The corporate media distorts socialism just as it lies about almost everything else in order to keep working people confused and disoriented. Solving our problems requires understanding socialism. Socialists understand the key to creating a better world is through: Education, Organization, Unity, & Action
  • Part 2: An Open Letter to President Barack Obama from Sidney J. Gluck

Sidney J. Gluck, Socialism Theory and Practice

I don't know whether you agree with my point of view or not; but I am functioning out of the feeling that the negative aspects of capitalism are becoming obvious to people all around the world regardless of class positions, that understanding its avaricious nature brings them closer to Marx's analysis of the system which all of you can read his seminal word on "Capital." Chapter 26 which deals with the law of capitalist accumulation will give you the prototype of which the USA's capitalism is the arch example of its worst (together with the British who started out but are following along with the USA).

Globalization is a mess and everyone knows that the USA has created more poverty with its capital investments than existed before the global expansion. We know that formal colonial countries are seeing through this domination and are moving in directions which reject the control of foreign capital in their own developments. We are living in a century of epochal change. Our hope is that the change which is now developing in the form of a bipolar economic structure will continue to redevelop economies technologically and sustainably. We hope too that the ultimate resolution of differences between the double-structured world economic system will not be resolved by warfare. That is the most important struggle we must be involved with. A peaceful acceptance of epochal change and the survival of all in a better world.

Full story...

Related:

Part 1: Albert Einstein, Why Socialism? Albert Einstein, Socialism Theory and Practice

Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is.

 

 

The Ignorance Caucus

For all the talk of reforming and reinventing the G.O.P., the ignorance caucus retains a firm grip on the party’s heart and mind.

Paul Krugman, New York (NY) Times

At a time when corporations are buying up elections - not to mention the 24-hour news cycle - help ensure that a source for truly independent journalism lives on. Support all reader supported Evergreene Digest today by using the donation button in the above right-hand corner. 

Paul Krugman / Fred R. Conrad / New York Times

Last week Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, gave what his office told us would be a major policy speech. And we should be grateful for the heads-up about the speech’s majorness. Otherwise, a read of the speech might have suggested that he was offering nothing more than a meager, warmed-over selection of stale ideas.

To be sure, Mr. Cantor tried to sound interested in serious policy discussion. But he didn’t succeed — and that was no accident. For these days his party dislikes the whole idea of applying critical thinking and evidence to policy questions. And no, that’s not a caricature: Last year the Texas G.O.P. explicitly condemned efforts to teach “critical thinking skills,” because, it said, such efforts “have the purpose of challenging the student’s fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority.” [Evergreene Digest Editor's Note: Molly Ivins once said that, if a member of the Texas legislature lost any more IQ points, "We'll have to put him in a flower pot and water him twice a week."]

Full story...

Which Members of Congress Are Standing Up for Economic Decency, and Which 'Progressives' Aren't?

  • In the real politics of the emerging struggle over Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, there’s a very big difference between expressing opposition to benefit cuts and promising not to vote for them.
  • No Benefit Cuts: Citizens' Vote Count
  • The sequester and possible cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security

Normon Soloman, Nation of Change

Friday 15 March 2013 | Now we know.

Every member of Congress has chosen whether to sign a letter making a crucial commitment: “We will vote against any and every cut to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security benefits—including raising the retirement age or cutting the cost of living adjustments that our constituents earned and need.”

The Democratic Party hierarchy doesn’t like the letter. House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi has said that cutting Social Security would “strengthen” it, and President Obama’s spokespeople keep emphasizing his eagerness to cut Social Security’s cost of living adjustments. The fact that Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit is beside the austerity point.

Full story...

Related:

No Benefit Cuts: Citizens' Vote Count, Moveon.org

  • Please call your Democratic Senators and Senate Leader Harry Reid and ask them: "Can I count on you to do everything in your power to stop this deal if it includes the reported cuts to Social Security benefits?"
  • Which Democratic Senators oppose any deal that cuts Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security benefits?

The sequester and possible cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, Matt Lockshin, CREDO Action

  • The White House is poised to cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits, but luckily these Democrats are leading the fight to oppose cuts
  • The petition reads: "Thank you for standing up and not only opposing -- but promising to vote against -- any deal that cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits. You are the true leaders in the fight to save our social safety net."
  • Pastors: It's Time to Speak Out for the Common Good
 

'State Department' Keystone XL Report Actually Written By TransCanada Contractor

  • Because the impact statement was written by a TransCanada contractor, not by State Department officials, it should come as no surprise that it presents a worldview of a global economy inevitably dependent on dirty fossil fuels that is entirely at odds with the expressed views of Secretary of State John Kerry.
  • AFL-CIO’s Own Oil Disaster
  • Breaking news on Keystone XL

Brad Johnson, Huffington Post

If you like reading this article, consider contributing a cafe latte to all-reader supported Evergreene Digest--using the donation button in the above right-hand corner—so we can bring you more just like it.

03/06/2013 | The State Department's "don't worry" environmental impact statement for the proposed Keystone XL tarsands pipeline, released late Friday afternoon, was written not by government officials but by a private company in the pay of the pipeline's owner. The "sustainability consultancy" Environmental Resources Management (ERM) was paid an undisclosed amount under contract to TransCanada to write the statement, which is now an official government document. The statement estimates, and then dismisses, the pipeline's massive carbon footprint and other environmental impacts, because, it asserts, the mining and burning of the tar sands is unstoppable.

The department's contractor-written Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement even says the pipeline will be safe from the climate impacts to which it will contribute.

Full story...

Related:

AFL-CIO’s Own Oil Disaster, Ann Robertson and Bill Leumer, Ann Robertson's ZSpace Page

  • By offering support for the Keystone XL pipeline, the AFL-CIO wins a few construction jobs and a little money; but it sacrifices everything of value.
  • 5 Reasons Why the Keystone XL Pipeline is Bad for the Economy

Breaking news on Keystone XL, Bill McKibben, 350.org

  • President Obama will be making a decision in a few short months. I won’t lie: today’s report makes the odds look even tougher -- and the power of the fossil fuel lobby hasn’t waned one bit.
  • We're hosting strategy sessions across the country.
  • We're building a global movement to solve the climate crisis.

 

 

 

Pages