You are here

More Todd "Legitimate Rape" AIken: School Lunch Is NOT Constitutional

  • An Akin spokesperson explained to the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent why Akin believes that it is wrong for the United States to feed needy children, and his explanation is a doozy.”
  • Todd Akin: It's Not a War on Women, It's a War on Critical Thinking and Democracy
  • The Elections Won't Bring Progressive Change, So What Can?

Ian Millhauser, Nation of Change

Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor Lydia Howell

At a time when corporations are buying up elections – not to mention the 24-hour-news cycle – help ensure that a source for truly independent journalism lives on. Support  all reader supported Evergreene Digest  today by using the donation button in the above right-hand corner.

(August, 20 2012) As ThinkProgress previously reported, U.S. Senate candidate Todd “Legitimate Rape” Akin (R-MO) believes the federal government should “end its support for school lunch programs,” and his votes reflect his hostility towards the idea that the richest country in the world should ensure that its children have adequate nutrition. Akin was one of just five members of Congress to oppose the bipartisan Child Nutrition Improvement and Integrity Act, which streamlined the process for children to qualify for free or reduced priced school lunches and expanded a program providing local produce to schools.

An Akin spokesperson explained to the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent why Akin believes that it is wrong for the United States to feed needy children, and his explanation is a doozy:

Full story...

Related:

Todd Akin: It's Not a War on Women, It's a War on Critical Thinking and Democracy, Soraya Chemaly, Huffington Post

  • What Todd Akin said and believes doesn't just play into a media-catchy, election year "war on women" narrative. It's part of a reactionary, fundamentalist backlash to modernity. It's a war on science. It's a war on facts. It's a war on critical thinking.
  • Wisconsin Bill Claims Single Moms Cause Child Abuse by Not Being Married

The Elections Won't Bring Progressive Change, So What Can?, Jack A. Smith, Countercurrents.org

  • In today's society — based on gross economic inequality facilitated by a two-party political system spanning center right to far right and where big money is the decisive factor in the electoral process — an ostensibly democratic election can hardly mitigate the worst of abuses afflicting working people and their families much less bring about substantial reform.
  • The Only Winner in November Will Be The Status Quo
  • Special Project | Campaign 2012: Week of  August 19, 2012