
Noam Chomsky, AlterNet
Submitted by Evergreene Digest Contributing Editor S. Brian Willson
October 5, 2012 | With the quadrennial presidential election extravaganza reaching its peak, it’s useful to ask how the political campaigns are dealing with the most crucial issues we face. The simple answer is: badly, or not at all. If so, some important questions arise: why, and what can we do about it?
There are two issues of overwhelming significance, because the fate of the species is at stake: environmental disaster, and nuclear war. The former is regularly on the front pages. On Sept. 19, for example, Justin Gillis reported in The New York Times that the melting of Arctic sea ice had ended for the year, “but not before demolishing the previous record – and setting off new warnings about the rapid pace of change in the region.” The melting is much faster than predicted by sophisticated computer models and the most recent U.N. report on global warming.
This article is made possible with the generous contributions of all reader supported Evergreene Digest readers like you. Thank you!
New data indicate that summer ice might be gone by 2020, with severe consequences. Previous estimates had summer ice disappearing by 2050. “But governments have not responded to the change with any greater urgency about limiting greenhouse emissions,” Gillis writes.
Full story...
Related:
Noam Chomsky On How Progressives Should Approach Election 2012, Matthew Filipowicz, AlterNet
Robert Scheer | Obama, Romney Leave No More Room to Argue, Robert Scheer, Truthdig